Crime and Politics
The crime rate is surging. It began to rise in 2020, and continues in 2021.
Daily there are multiple reports on “Next Door: Ballard” (our Seattle neighborhood) of break-in’s, car thefts and (an especially popular one) stealing packages from Amazon/ UPS/ USPS off people’s porches. Sometimes the latter are accompanied by videos of the culprit. What’s also interesting is how few people go on to report on a resulting interaction with police. Have people given up on calling the police? Have the police given up responding?
I bring this up because crime is likely to be an issue in the upcoming Seattle mayoral, City Attorney and at-large Council seat elections. What will the contenders have to say about it?
It will likely be an even bigger issue, unless something changes soon, in national elections, the 2022 Congressional races. The GOP can’t wait, I suspect, to play its “law and order” card.
I am of two minds on the issue. I like to think that ambivalence is a high moral ground.
Mind one. We have a hammer problem with policing. As in, “when every problem is a nail, every solution is a hammer.” We have asked the police to do too much. Or to put it another way, we send police to deal with stuff that is better dealt with by other people using other methods.
In Ezra Klein’s recent podcast, titled “Violent Crime Is Spiking: Do Liberals Have An Answer,” Ezra interviews James Foreman Jr. of Yale Law School and the author of Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America. If you want to understand the nexus of policing and racial issues, this is a essential podcast. I totally recommend it.
Foreman, who is a street smart prof and honest about what he doesn’t know, basically says we need more tools in our bag than just a hammer, a.k.a “aggressive policing.” He talkes about a bunch of such tools that have proven effective at disrupting violence. There’s support for this kind of thing in Biden’s infrastructure bill. It is exactly the kind of thing Republicans do not count as “infrastructure.”
My other mind? At “The Dispatch” a more conservative minded Jonah Goldberg writes a great piece about Seattle’s “CHAZ,” the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone, as we come up on the one year anniversary of that — what’s the right word? — experiment, mess, failure.
Goldberg spends the early part of his piece pretty much mocking “CHAZ,” as in, “I loved CHAZ. It was a spontaneous radical anarchist community that shared a nickname with the sort of blue-blazered boarding school kid who uses “summer” as a verb and corrects the pronunciation of “Gstaad.”
Goldberg goes on to make a real point, namely that crime hurts the poor and the vulnerable disproportionally.
For the 30 million or so Americans living in households earning less than $15,000 a year, crime represents a horrific fact of daily life. Compared to the middle class, the poor fall victim to nearly six times as many rapes, more than twice as many robberies, almost double the number of aggravated assaults, and half again more acts of theft. Crime is, in short, an inversely progressive tax.”
Goldberg writes about progressive cities, like Seattle, that no longer prosecute shop-lifting because that is to “criminalize poverty.” Recall the measure before the City Council this spring, one that exempted anyone from criminal charges if they plead poverty or mental distress. Not sure where that one stands.
The result of the enlightened idea of not prosecuting shoplifting? Stores are forced out of business. High-crime areas lose stores and services, becoming “food deserts,” more hopeless and desperate than ever.
From my viewpoint, it appears that Seattle with police force reductions, leadership disarray, and political pandering, is doing something like that to large swaths of its citizens. It didn’t used to be that there were private security people in every grocery store. Now there are. My guess is that private security is one of our largest growth industries. But the jobs are low-wage and mind-numbing.
So, what am I saying? It’s complicated. Per Klein and Foreman, we need more tools in our bag than a hammer. “Warrior” policing isn’t the answer. And yet, per Goldberg, tossing out the hammer in the name of progressive politics is not only not a solution; it may end up hurting the most vulnerable most of all.